Patrick Zahraj vs Alvin Nicholas Tudorica Head-to-Head Stats, Results & Performance Comparison
Wojtek Kolan
Published on 14 Apr at 10:28 PM UTC
HEAD TO HEAD
P. Zahraj vs A. Nicholas Tudorica

GER
1
Win
Played
0
Win

CAN
1
Win
Played
0
Win
Head-to-head: Zahraj 1 - 0 Tudorica
They have played 2 sets in total, with Patrick Zahraj winning 2 and Alvin Nicholas Tudorica winning 0. The last match between Patrick Zahraj and Alvin Nicholas Tudorica was at the San Luis Potosi Challenger, 14-04-2025, Round: R1, Surface: Clay, with Patrick Zahraj getting the victory 6-3 6-1.
| Players | Head To Head Match Wins |
|---|---|
| Zahraj | 1 |
| Tudorica | 0 |
Last 1 H2H Matches:
(R1) San Luis Potosi Challenger(04-14-25)
P. Zahraj vs A. N. Tudorica H2H Profile
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| $10,645 | Career Prize Money | $0 |
| 56.18% (150-117) | Career Total W/L | 62.59% (87-52) |
| 1 | Clay | 0 |
| 0 | Titles | 3 |
| 1 | Total H2H Matches | 0 |
| 0.00% (0-1) | YTD Win/Loss | 0% (0-0) |
P. Zahraj vs A. N. Tudorica Match Preview:
Analyzing the second serve performance over the past six months, Zahraj has consistently outperformed Tudorica, winning 42.23% of points compared to Tudorica's 38.97%. A strong link exists between second serve stats and the accuracy of match predictions. When examining return game statistics, Zahraj again leads slightly, capturing 50.09% of their opponent's second serve points, in contrast to Tudorica's 48.26%. First serve return stats are nearly identical, with Tudorica at 28.65% and Zahraj at 28.55%, both indicators are crucial for predicting the outcome of their head-to-head matchups.
Under pressure, Zahraj shows a slight edge by saving 53.51% of breakpoints compared to Tudorica's 50.67%. This can be a significant stat for those interested in in-game betting predictions. Looking at performance over the last year, Tudorica boasts a higher win percentage at 71.26% (W/L 62/25), whereas Zahraj has won 59.04% (W/L 49/34) of their matches, providing a comprehensive head-to-head prediction overview. Examining career surface preferences, Tudorica thrives on Hard courts with a win rate of 75% (W/L 54/18), while Zahraj finds success on Indoor Hard courts, winning 65% (W/L 41/22).
In terms of player level, Tudorica has primarily played in Futures/Satellites/ITF tournaments $10K over the last year, winning 74.68% of those matches (W/L 59/20), whereas Zahraj has participated mostly in Challengers/ITF tournaments > $10K, achieving a 60.87% win rate (W/L 28/18). The quality of their opponents further distinguishes them; Tudorica has faced players with an average ranking of 90.83, while Zahraj’s opponents average a rank of 177.29 in the past year.
A look at deciding set performances shows that Zahraj is stronger, winning 68% of deciding sets compared to Tudorica's 55%. When it comes to converting breakpoints in recent form, Zahraj again surpasses Tudorica with a conversion rate of 34.43% versus Tudorica's 28.37%. Considering these statistics and various facets of their games, Zahraj appears to have a slight edge and is more likely to emerge victorious in their upcoming match.
Patrick Zahraj vs Alvin Nicholas Tudorica Editorial Preview By TennisTipster88.
P. Zahraj vs A. N. Tudorica H2H Stats Used In Our Predictions
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 1 | H2H Matches Won | 0 |
| 2 | Sets Won | 0 |
| 12 | Games Won | 4 |
| 2 | Aces (Total) | 0 |
| 7 | Total Double Faults | 4 |
| 1:24:4 | Average Match Time | 1:24:4 |
| 56% (34/61) | 1st Serve % | 67% (39/58) |
| 74% (25/34) | 1st Serve Win % | 44% (17/39) |
| 37% (10/27) | 2nd Serve Win % | 37% (7/19) |
| 46% (6/13) | Break Pts Won % | 22% (2/9) |
| 59% (34/58) | Return Points Win % | 43% (26/61) |
| 100% (1/1) | Best‑of‑3 Win % | 0% (0/1) |
| 100% (1/1) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/1) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/0) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 0% (0/1) |
Recent Performance Stats
P. Zahraj Recent Matches Played
A. N. Tudorica Recent Matches Played

P. Zahraj vs A. N. Tudorica Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 56.18% (150/117) | YTD Win/Loss | 62.59% (87/52) |
| 55.15% (332/270) | Sets Win/Loss | 61.79% (186/115) |
| 52.14% (2991/2746) | Games Win/Loss | 54.65% (1475/1224) |
| 52.78% (19/17) | Hard Win/Loss | 68.60% (59/27) |
| 53.44% (70/61) | Clay Win/Loss | 48.48% (16/17) |
| 61.54% (56/35) | Indoor Hard W/L | 60.00% (12/8) |
| 55.56% (5/4) | Grass Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) |
| 0.34 | Aces Per Game | 0.07 |
| 967 | Aces Total | 96 |
| 0.36 | Double Faults Per Game | 0.22 |
| 1009 | Total Double Faults | 290 |
| 1:30:19 | Average Match Time | 1:18:18 |
| 376.52 | Average Opponent Rank | 371.85 |
| 61% (9352/15275) | 1st Serve % | 64% (4373/6780) |
| 69% (6427/9352) | 1st Serve Win % | 65% (2833/4373) |
| 45% (2644/5923) | 2nd Serve Win % | 49% (1182/2407) |
| 43% (714/1677) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 47% (376/795) |
| 42% (6473/15557) | Return Points Win % | 44% (2940/6639) |
| 0% (0/0) | Masters W/L | 0.00% (0/1) |
| 30.00% (3/7) | Main Tour W/L | 0% (0/0) |
| 52.70% (39/35) | Challenger W/L | 35.00% (7/13) |
| 59.02% (108/75) | Futures W/L | 67.80% (80/38) |
| 57% (148/261) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 63% (86/137) |
| 0% (0/1) | Best of 5 Sets Win % | 100% (1/1) |
| 54% (40/74) | Tiebreaks Win % (Total) | 48% (10/21) |
| 54% (39/72) | Deciding Set Win % | 48% (11/23) |
| 86% (148/128) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 92% (85/78) |
| 13% (148/19) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 8% (85/7) |
| 18% (119/21) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 17% (54/9) |